All models

GoogleUnited States· released Dec 2025

Gemini 3 Flash

Ranked #26, 37.5% behind the frontier on average.

Google, United States. One of 14 models from this lab on the Index.

Third-party publishedMedium confidence (7+ comparable tests, 3+ Index categories)

Snapshot September 8, 2026

OpenCharts Index

62.5

Ranked #26 (21 to 30) of 36 · 37.5% behind the frontier on average · 18 comparable tests · 3 counting categories

Drop any single test and the Index lands between 57.0 and 66.6, anywhere from #21 to #30. Neighbours inside that range are ties.

54.8HARD SET

5 of 8 hardest tests · share of the frontier

Distance to today's frontier on the hardest tests. Not a measure of intelligence.

What it's known for

Gemini 3 Flash, in 18 results.

Strongest in reasoning (71.8) and agentic (70.1). It trails the frontier most in math, 54.3% behind on average. No comparable result yet in long context. Between 35% and 40% behind the best published results, on average. Drop any single test and it would sit anywhere from #21 to #30.

Strongest category

Reasoning

Hard, novel problems: graduate science, abstract puzzles, expert exams.

71.8

Mean of 4 of the category's 6 comparable tests. Counts toward the Index.

Best single result

Mock AIME 2024–2025

Solve competition mathematics problems that have a single exact integer answer.

95.6%

95.6% of the best (100.0%) · #19 of 78.

Olympiad-style problems need long, careful chains of reasoning, and there is no partial credit.

Where it trails

ProofBench

Write a complete, rigorous proof, graded for rigor rather than for a final answer.

15.0%

85.0% behind the best published result (100.0%) · #44 of 61.

A proof shows the reasoning itself. A right answer with a wrong argument scores nothing.

Not measured yet

No comparable result yet in this category. A blank is a blank, never a zero, and it does not lower the Index.

  • Long context

Covered, but not averaged into the Index:

  • Knowledgesingle-test category, shown beside the Index · 88.4
  • Coding3 of 7 tests · needs 4 · mean 59.7
  • Multimodalsingle-test category, shown beside the Index · 88.4
  • Human preferencesingle-test category, shown beside the Index · 90.4
Every score, with its source

See it at work

What Gemini 3 Flash was asked to do, and how it did.

Every test it has taken, by category, with the kind of task it faced, who produced the number and where the result landed against the best published one. The examples are original and illustrative, never items from the datasets themselves.

Human preference · mean 90.4 across 1 comparable test · a single-test category, shown beside the Index and never averaged into it

Text ArenaLeaderboard

Answer the same prompt as a rival model; real users vote blind on which answer they prefer.

1,474

45% expected win rate against the board leader (1,507)
#24 of 92

board 2026-09-02

Source: Arena

Every result is read against the best published one on its test: percent scores as a share of the best above chance, Arena ratings as the expected win rate against the board leader, open-ended values on a log scale. Sitting a harder exam never lowers a model. Every number links to the publisher that produced it.

Head to head

Gemini 3 Flash against whoever you pick.

Choose a rival. Every counted test both have taken appears side by side as a share of the best published result on that test, with the category means above. A win is a higher share; a gap under 2 points is a tie, because one item on a 45-problem exam is 2.2 points and publishers' own standard errors are of that order.

Gemini 3 Flash

#26·Index 62.5C

0 : 11

wins · 0 ties · 11 shared

GPT-6 Astra

#1·Index 99.0A+

GPT-6 Astra comes out ahead on 11 of the 11 tests both have taken.

Category means

  • Reasoning

    71.8
    99.6
  • Knowledge

    88.4
    100.0
  • Coding

    59.7
    97.7
  • Math

    45.7
    99.8
  • Agentic

    70.1
    98.5
  • Multimodal

    88.4
  • Human preference

    90.4

Shared tests · biggest gaps first

Bars are distances to the best published result on each test (percent scores above chance, Arena ratings as win rate against the leader, open-ended values on a log scale). Raw values as the publishers report them.

Open GPT-6 Astra

Scores

Every test, every source

The best published run per benchmark, the raw value as the publisher reports it, who produced the number, how close it comes to the best published result on that test, and where the model sits among every model scored on it. Percent scores are read above chance, Arena ratings as a win rate against the board leader, open-ended values on a log scale. A test with too few models to compare against is shown but not counted.

Category means

  • Reasoning71.8 · 4/6
  • Knowledgebeside88.4 · 1/1
  • Coding59.7 · 3/7
  • Math45.7 · 4/5
  • Agentic70.1 · 4/8
  • Multimodalbeside88.4 · 1/1
  • Human preferencebeside90.4 · 1/1
  • Long context

Mean · tests taken of the category's comparable tests. A faded category either rests on fewer than half of them or is a single-test category (marked “beside”), which is shown next to the Index and never averaged into it.

GPQA DiamondEpoch-runReasoning

89.4%

91.0% of the best (95.8%), above chance
58th percentile of 78 · n = 198

preview · high

Source: Epoch AI — AI Benchmarking Hub
ARC-AGI-2LeaderboardReasoning

33.6%

35.4% of the best (95.0%)
38th percentile of 51 · n = 120

preview

Source: Epoch AI — AI Benchmarking Hub
ARC-AGI-1LeaderboardReasoning

84.7%

86.0% of the best (98.5%)
44th percentile of 51 · n = 100

preview

Source: Epoch AI — AI Benchmarking Hub
SimpleBenchLeaderboardReasoning

61.1%

74.6% of the best (81.9%)
53th percentile of 46

preview

Source: Epoch AI — AI Benchmarking Hub
SimpleQA VerifiedEpoch-runKnowledge

66.8%

88.4% of the best (75.6%)
89th percentile of 57 · n = 1,000

preview · high

Source: Epoch AI — AI Benchmarking Hub
SWE-bench VerifiedEpoch-runCoding

75.4%

90.3% of the best (83.5%)
56th percentile of 26 · n = 500

preview

Source: Epoch AI — AI Benchmarking Hub
WeirdMLLeaderboardCoding

61.6%

66.3% of the best (92.9%)
62th percentile of 69

preview

Source: Epoch AI — AI Benchmarking Hub
Code Arena (WebDev)LeaderboardCoding

1,438

11% expected win rate against the board leader (1,797)
46th percentile of 86

board 2026-09-05

Source: Arena (LMArena) — Leaderboard Dataset

95.6%

95.6% of the best (100.0%)
71th percentile of 78 · n = 45

preview · high

Source: Epoch AI — AI Benchmarking Hub

51.2%

54.7% of the best (93.7%)
40th percentile of 61 · n = 290

preview

Source: Epoch AI — AI Benchmarking Hub
FrontierMath Tier 4Epoch-runMath

17.1%

17.5% of the best (97.6%)
26th percentile of 51 · n = 48

preview

Source: Epoch AI — AI Benchmarking Hub
ProofBenchLeaderboardMath

15.0%

15.0% of the best (100.0%)
27th percentile of 61

preview · reasoning effort: high

Source: Epoch AI — AI Benchmarking Hub
Terminal-BenchLeaderboardAgentic

64.3%

75.9% of the best (84.7%)
77th percentile of 40

preview · agent: Junie CLI

Source: Epoch AI — AI Benchmarking Hub
APEX-AgentsLeaderboardAgentic

24.0%

50.6% of the best (47.4%)
50th percentile of 49

preview

Source: Epoch AI — AI Benchmarking Hub
Vending-Bench 2LeaderboardAgentic

$3,635

63.8% of the best ($11,182) on a log scale
38th percentile of 53

preview

Source: Epoch AI — AI Benchmarking Hub
DeepResearch BenchLeaderboardAgentic

49.8%

90.1% of the best (55.3%)
67th percentile of 19 · n = 100

preview · low

Source: Epoch AI — AI Benchmarking Hub
Vision ArenaLeaderboardMultimodal

1,272

44% expected win rate against the board leader (1,313)
62th percentile of 54

board 2026-08-27

Source: Arena (LMArena) — Leaderboard Dataset
Text ArenaLeaderboardHuman preference

1,474

45% expected win rate against the board leader (1,507)
73th percentile of 92

board 2026-09-02

Source: Arena (LMArena) — Leaderboard Dataset

Nearby on the leaderboard

Compare with its neighbours.

Theo

The best models, ranked here, working inside Theo.

28 of the models on this page run inside Theo today. Theo picks the right one for each step and always shows which engine answered.