All models

GoogleUnited States· released Oct 2026

Gemini 4 Carbon

Best published result on 5 of the 8 tests it has taken.

A preview that publishers score from early access. It is not generally available yet.

Third-party publishedLow confidence (thin coverage)

Snapshot November 10, 2026

OpenCharts Index

95.8

Provisional: not enough comparable tests or counting categories to rank yet · 8 comparable tests · 1 counting categories

Drop any single test and the Index lands between 95.8 and 98.2.

—HARD SET

Needs more results (1 of 5 so far)

Averaging 87.5 on the 1 it has; the score opens at 4 of 5.

Distance to today's frontier on the hardest tests. Not a measure of intelligence.

What it's known for

Gemini 4 Carbon, in 8 results.

Strongest in agentic (95.8). It holds the best published result on APEX-Agents, Blueprint-Bench 2 and CritPt and 2 more. Its widest gap is on Code Arena (WebDev), 14.2% behind the best published result. No comparable results yet in knowledge and math. Within 5% of the best published results, on average.

Strongest category

Agentic

Long-horizon tasks with tools: terminals, desktops, browsers, whole jobs.

95.8

Mean of 3 of the category's 6 comparable tests. Counts toward the Index.

Best single result

APEX-Agents

Complete professional-services work in consulting, law and finance as an agent, graded against expert rubrics.

84.2%

Best published result of 58 models.

Expert-graded knowledge work is what professional teams would actually delegate.

Where it trails

Code Arena (WebDev)

Build a web app from the same prompt as a rival model; real users vote blind on the result.

1,768

14.2 points short of parity with the board leader (1,818) · #3 of 110.

People judging finished apps side by side is the most honest measure of front-end quality.

Not measured yet

No comparable result yet in these 2 categories. A blank is a blank, never a zero, and it does not lower the Index.

  • Knowledge
  • Math

Covered, but not averaged into the Index:

  • Reasoning1 of 8 tests · needs 4 · mean 100.0
  • Coding2 of 6 tests · needs 3 · mean 90.9
  • Multimodal1 of 4 tests · needs 2 · mean 100.0
  • Human preferencesingle-test category, shown beside the Index · 100.0
Every score, with its source

See it at work

What Gemini 4 Carbon was asked to do, and how it did.

Every test it has taken, by category, with the kind of task it faced, who produced the number and where the result landed against the best published one. The examples are original and illustrative, never items from the datasets themselves.

Reasoning · mean 100.0 across 1 comparable test · not counted toward the Index yet (fewer than half the category's tests)

CritPtLeaderboard

Solve an unpublished research-level physics problem to a numeric or symbolic answer checked by an official server.

36.0%

best published result
of 102 models

high

Epoch AI's review rated version 1 Flawed (October 2026): two audits found scoring defects in at least a fifth of its problems. The leaderboard moved to a revised version 2 on October 22, 2026, and Epoch AI's file does not say which version each score comes from.

Source: CritPt / Artificial Analysis

Every result is read against the best published one on its test: percent scores as a share of the best above chance, Arena ratings as the expected win rate against the board leader, open-ended values on a log scale. Sitting a harder exam never lowers a model. Every number links to the publisher that produced it.

Head to head

Gemini 4 Carbon against whoever you pick.

Choose a rival. Every counted test both have taken appears side by side as a share of the best published result on that test, with the category means above. A win is a higher share; a gap under 2 points is a tie, because one item on a 45-problem exam is 2.2 points and publishers' own standard errors are of that order.

Gemini 4 Carbon

provisional·Index 95.8A+

5 : 1

wins · 2 ties · 8 shared

GPT-6 Astra

#1·Index 93.7A

Gemini 4 Carbon comes out ahead on 5 of the 8 tests both have taken.

Category means

  • Reasoning

    100.0
    96.1
  • Knowledge

    —
    80.4
  • Coding

    90.9
    93.4
  • Math

    —
    98.8
  • Agentic

    95.8
    90.6
  • Multimodal

    100.0
    89.6
  • Human preference

    100.0
    85.2

Shared tests · biggest gaps first

Bars are distances to the best published result on each test (percent scores above chance, Arena ratings as win rate against the leader, open-ended values on a log scale). Raw values as the publishers report them.

Open GPT-6 Astra

Scores

Every test, every source

The best published run per benchmark, the raw value as the publisher reports it, who produced the number, how close it comes to the best published result on that test, and where the model sits among every model scored on it. Percent scores are read above chance, Arena ratings as a win rate against the board leader, open-ended values on a log scale. A test with too few models to compare against is shown but not counted, and so is an archived test: one whose publisher no longer covers new models.

Category means

  • Reasoning100.0 · 1/8
  • Knowledge—
  • Coding90.9 · 2/6
  • Math—
  • Agentic95.8 · 3/6
  • Multimodal100.0 · 1/4
  • Human preferencebeside100.0 · 1/1
  • Long context—

Mean · tests taken of the category's comparable tests. A faded category either rests on fewer than half of them or is a single-test category (marked “beside”), which is shown next to the Index and never averaged into it.

CritPtLeaderboardReasoning

36.0%

best published result
of 102 models

high

Source: Epoch AI — AI Benchmarking Hub
SciCodeLeaderboardCoding

64.2%

96.0% of the best (66.9%)
99th percentile of 96 · n = 338

high

Source: Epoch AI — AI Benchmarking Hub
Code Arena (WebDev)LeaderboardCoding

1,768

43% expected win rate against the board leader (1,818)
98th percentile of 110

high · board 2026-11-09

Source: Arena (LMArena) — Leaderboard Dataset
APEX-AgentsLeaderboardAgentic

84.2%

best published result
of 58 models

Source: Epoch AI — AI Benchmarking Hub
Vending-Bench 2LeaderboardAgentic

$16,484

best published result
of 65 models

Source: Epoch AI — AI Benchmarking Hub
FrontierSWE v2LeaderboardAgentic

61.2%

87.5% of the best (69.9%)
81th percentile of 22 · n = 34

high · harness: proximus

Source: Proximal (FrontierSWE leaderboard)
Blueprint-Bench 2LeaderboardMultimodal

58.6%

best published result
of 36 models

Source: Epoch AI — AI Benchmarking Hub
Text ArenaLeaderboardHuman preference

1,526

best published result
of 113 models

high · board 2026-11-09

Source: Arena (LMArena) — Leaderboard Dataset

Top of the leaderboard

Compare with its neighbours.

Theo

The best models, ranked here, working inside Theo.

29 of the models on this page run inside Theo today. Theo picks the right one for each step and always shows which engine answered.