All models

GoogleUnited States· released May 2026

Gemini 3.5 Flash

Ranked #18, 31.8% behind the frontier on average.

Google, United States. One of 14 models from this lab on the Index.

Third-party publishedMedium confidence (7+ comparable tests, 3+ Index categories)

Snapshot September 8, 2026

OpenCharts Index

68.2

Ranked #18 (17 to 22) of 36 · 31.8% behind the frontier on average · 18 comparable tests · 3 counting categories

Drop any single test and the Index lands between 63.7 and 71.5, anywhere from #17 to #22. Neighbours inside that range are ties.

66.4HARD SET

4 of 8 hardest tests · share of the frontier

Distance to today's frontier on the hardest tests. Not a measure of intelligence.

What it's known for

Gemini 3.5 Flash, in 18 results.

Strongest in reasoning (80.0) and coding (69.3). It trails the frontier most in math, 44.7% behind on average. No comparable result yet in long context. Between 30% and 35% behind the best published results, on average. Drop any single test and it would sit anywhere from #17 to #22.

Strongest category

Reasoning

Hard, novel problems: graduate science, abstract puzzles, expert exams.

80.0

Mean of 5 of the category's 6 comparable tests. Counts toward the Index.

Best single result

GPQA Diamond

Answer a PhD-level multiple-choice question in physics, chemistry or biology that a web search will not settle.

92.8%

95.8% of the best (95.8%), above chance · #13 of 78.

Expert-level science questions are the closest thing to asking a specialist colleague. A model that gets them right can check a technical claim instead of echoing it.

Where it trails

FrontierMath Tier 4

Solve the hardest FrontierMath tier: problems that take expert mathematicians days.

26.8%

72.5% behind the best published result (97.6%) · #25 of 51.

The deepest end of the set. Progress here signals genuinely new capability.

Not measured yet

No comparable result yet in this category. A blank is a blank, never a zero, and it does not lower the Index.

  • Long context

Covered, but not averaged into the Index:

  • Knowledgesingle-test category, shown beside the Index · 87.6
  • Agentic1 of 8 tests · needs 4 · mean 76.6
  • Multimodalsingle-test category, shown beside the Index · 91.7
  • Human preferencesingle-test category, shown beside the Index · 92.0
Every score, with its source

See it at work

What Gemini 3.5 Flash was asked to do, and how it did.

Every test it has taken, by category, with the kind of task it faced, who produced the number and where the result landed against the best published one. The examples are original and illustrative, never items from the datasets themselves.

Human preference · mean 92.0 across 1 comparable test · a single-test category, shown beside the Index and never averaged into it

Text ArenaLeaderboard

Answer the same prompt as a rival model; real users vote blind on which answer they prefer.

1,479

46% expected win rate against the board leader (1,507)
#20 of 92

high · board 2026-09-02

Source: Arena

Every result is read against the best published one on its test: percent scores as a share of the best above chance, Arena ratings as the expected win rate against the board leader, open-ended values on a log scale. Sitting a harder exam never lowers a model. Every number links to the publisher that produced it.

Head to head

Gemini 3.5 Flash against whoever you pick.

Choose a rival. Every counted test both have taken appears side by side as a share of the best published result on that test, with the category means above. A win is a higher share; a gap under 2 points is a tie, because one item on a 45-problem exam is 2.2 points and publishers' own standard errors are of that order.

Gemini 3.5 Flash

#18·Index 68.2C+

0 : 12

wins · 0 ties · 12 shared

GPT-6 Astra

#1·Index 99.0A+

GPT-6 Astra comes out ahead on 12 of the 12 tests both have taken.

Category means

  • Reasoning

    80.0
    99.6
  • Knowledge

    87.6
    100.0
  • Coding

    69.3
    97.7
  • Math

    55.3
    99.8
  • Agentic

    76.6
    98.5
  • Multimodal

    91.7
  • Human preference

    92.0

Shared tests · biggest gaps first

Bars are distances to the best published result on each test (percent scores above chance, Arena ratings as win rate against the leader, open-ended values on a log scale). Raw values as the publishers report them.

Open GPT-6 Astra

Scores

Every test, every source

The best published run per benchmark, the raw value as the publisher reports it, who produced the number, how close it comes to the best published result on that test, and where the model sits among every model scored on it. Percent scores are read above chance, Arena ratings as a win rate against the board leader, open-ended values on a log scale. A test with too few models to compare against is shown but not counted.

Category means

  • Reasoning80.0 · 5/6
  • Knowledgebeside87.6 · 1/1
  • Coding69.3 · 5/7
  • Math55.3 · 4/5
  • Agentic76.6 · 1/8
  • Multimodalbeside91.7 · 1/1
  • Human preferencebeside92.0 · 1/1
  • Long context

Mean · tests taken of the category's comparable tests. A faded category either rests on fewer than half of them or is a single-test category (marked “beside”), which is shown next to the Index and never averaged into it.

GPQA DiamondEpoch-runReasoning

92.8%

95.8% of the best (95.8%), above chance
84th percentile of 78 · n = 198

high

Source: Epoch AI — AI Benchmarking Hub
ARC-AGI-2LeaderboardReasoning

72.1%

75.9% of the best (95.0%)
70th percentile of 51 · n = 120

high

Source: Epoch AI — AI Benchmarking Hub
ARC-AGI-1LeaderboardReasoning

92.5%

93.9% of the best (98.5%)
66th percentile of 51 · n = 100

high

Source: Epoch AI — AI Benchmarking Hub
SimpleBenchLeaderboardReasoning

76.7%

93.7% of the best (81.9%)
91th percentile of 46

Source: Epoch AI — AI Benchmarking Hub
CritPtLeaderboardReasoning

13.1%

40.7% of the best (32.3%)
62th percentile of 78

high

Source: Epoch AI — AI Benchmarking Hub
SimpleQA VerifiedEpoch-runKnowledge

66.2%

87.6% of the best (75.6%)
86th percentile of 57 · n = 1,000

high

Source: Epoch AI — AI Benchmarking Hub
SWE-bench VerifiedEpoch-runCoding

79.3%

95.0% of the best (83.5%)
96th percentile of 26 · n = 500

high

Source: Epoch AI — AI Benchmarking Hub
SciCodeLeaderboardCoding

53.1%

85.6% of the best (62.0%)
71th percentile of 73 · n = 338

high

Source: Epoch AI — AI Benchmarking Hub
WeirdMLLeaderboardCoding

62.6%

67.4% of the best (92.9%)
63th percentile of 69

high

Source: Epoch AI — AI Benchmarking Hub
CursorBenchLeaderboardCoding

49.8%

67.8% of the best (73.4%)
20th percentile of 21

Source: Epoch AI — AI Benchmarking Hub
Code Arena (WebDev)LeaderboardCoding

1,500

15% expected win rate against the board leader (1,797)
60th percentile of 86

high · board 2026-09-05

Source: Arena (LMArena) — Leaderboard Dataset

95.6%

95.6% of the best (100.0%)
71th percentile of 78 · n = 45

high

Source: Epoch AI — AI Benchmarking Hub

62.8%

67.0% of the best (93.7%)
60th percentile of 61 · n = 290

high

Source: Epoch AI — AI Benchmarking Hub
FrontierMath Tier 4Epoch-runMath

26.8%

27.5% of the best (97.6%)
46th percentile of 51 · n = 48

high

Source: Epoch AI — AI Benchmarking Hub
ProofBenchLeaderboardMath

31.0%

31.0% of the best (100.0%)
53th percentile of 61

high · reasoning effort: high

Source: Epoch AI — AI Benchmarking Hub
Vending-Bench 2LeaderboardAgentic

$5,396

76.6% of the best ($11,182) on a log scale
62th percentile of 53

Source: Epoch AI — AI Benchmarking Hub
Vision ArenaLeaderboardMultimodal

1,284

46% expected win rate against the board leader (1,313)
79th percentile of 54

high · board 2026-08-27

Source: Arena (LMArena) — Leaderboard Dataset
Text ArenaLeaderboardHuman preference

1,479

46% expected win rate against the board leader (1,507)
79th percentile of 92

high · board 2026-09-02

Source: Arena (LMArena) — Leaderboard Dataset

Nearby on the leaderboard

Compare with its neighbours.

Theo

The best models, ranked here, working inside Theo.

28 of the models on this page run inside Theo today. Theo picks the right one for each step and always shows which engine answered.